The dosimetric impact of vaginal balloon-packing on intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy for gynecological cancer

Purpose: We perform a clinical retrospective study to determine whether a vaginal balloon-packing system provides a dosimetric reduction to organs at risk (OARs) versus traditional gauze packing for gynecological high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). We also test various balloon filling materials for optimizing imaging quality. Material and methods: Filling materials for balloon-packing were evaluated based on imaging quality with X-ray, computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging modalities. We then retrospectively reviewed 45 HDR-BT plans of 18 patients performed with gauze packing and 39 plans of 16 patients performed with balloon-packing. Twelve patients received both gauze and balloon-packing. HDR-BT was delivered with an iridium-192 afterloader and a Fletcher-Suit-Declos-style T&O applicator. At each fraction, 3D imaging was obtained. The D2cc values of OARs were calculated, as well as ICRU-defined point doses. Results: In the 84 HDR fractions reviewed, vaginal balloon-packing provides statistically equivalent doses to rectum, bladder, and sigmoid compared to gauze packing. On average balloon-packing produced average reductions of 3.3% and 6.9% in the rectal and sigmoid D2ccdoses and an increase of 3.2% to the bladder D2cc dose (normalized to prescription dose), although none of these values were statistically significant for the twelve patients who received both gauze and balloon-packing (32 and 40 total fractions, respectively). Conclusions: In the 84 HDR fractions analyzed, vaginal balloon-packing is as effective as gauze packing for dose sparing to the rectum, bladder, and sigmoid. A 1 : 1 solution of saline and contrast for filling material enables easy contouring for image-guided HDR with minimal artefacts

Image-Based Treatment Planning of the Post-Lumpectomy Breast Utilizing CT and 3TMRI

Accurate lumpectomy cavity definition is critical in breast treatment planning. We compared contouring lumpectomy cavity volume and cavity visualization score (CVS) with CT versus 3T MRI. 29 patients were imaged with CT and 3T MRI. Seven additional boost planning sets were obtained for 36 image sets total. Three observers contoured the lumpectomy cavity on all images, assigning a cavity visualization score (CVS ) of 1 to 5. Measures of consistency and agreement for CT volumes were 98.84% and 98.62%, for T1 MRI were 95.65% and 95.55%, and for T2 MRI were 97.63% and 97.71%. The mean CT, T1 MRI, and T2 MRI CVS scores were 3.28, 3.38, and 4.32, respectively. There was a highly significant difference between CT and T2 scores (P < .00001) and between T1 and T2 scores (P < .00001). Interobserver consistency and agreement regarding volumes were high for all three modalities with T2 MRI CVS the highest. MRI may contribute to target definition in selected patients

High resolution (3 Tesla) MRI-guided conformal brachytherapy for cervical cancer: consequences of different high-risk CTV sizes

Purpose: To evaluate conventional brachytherapy (BT) plans using dose-volume parameters and high resolution (3 Tesla) MRI datasets, and to quantify dosimetric benefits and limitations when MRI-guided, conformal BT (MRIG-CBT) plans are generated. Material and methods: Fifty-five clinical high-dose-rate BT plans from 14 cervical cancer patients were retrospectively studied. All conventional plans were created using MRI with titanium tandem-and-ovoid applicator (T&O) for delivery. For each conventional plan, a MRIG-CBT plan was retrospectively generated using hybrid inverse optimization. Three categories of high risk (HR)-CTV were considered based on volume: non-bulky (\u3c 20 cc), low-bulky (\u3e 20 cc and \u3c 40 cc) and bulky (≥ 40 cc). Dose-volume metrics of D90 of HR-CTV and D2cc and D0.1cc of rectum, bladder, and sigmoid colon were analyzed. Results: Tumor coverage (HR-CTV D90) of the conventional plans was considerably affected by the HR-CTV size. Sixteen percent of the plans covered HR-CTV D90 with the prescription dose within 5%. At least one OAR had D2cc values over the GEC-ESTRO recommended limits in 52.7% of the conventional plans. MRIG-CBT plans showed improved target coverage for HR-CTV D90 of 98 and 97% of the prescribed dose for non-bulky and low-bulky tumors, respectively. No MRIG-CBT plans surpassed the D2cc limits of any OAR. Only small improvements (D90 of 80%) were found for large targets (\u3e 40 cc) when using T&O applicator approach. Conclusions: MRIG-CBT plans displayed considerable improvement for tumor coverage and OAR sparing over conventional treatment. When the HR-CTV volume exceeded 40 cc, its improvements were diminished when using a conventional intracavitary applicator

Ethical Issues Related to Patient Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine

It is important for physicians to set aside their personal opinions and establish open lines of communication with patients about alternatives to conventional medical treatment

When Is Standard Treatment Sufficiently Active to Make Use of a Placebo-Controlled Trial Unethical?

Research has demonstrated that double blinding can lessen the potential for bias in study outcomes, such as perceiving a drug as more effective in the experimental arm of a study. Effective double-blinding techniques minimize the influence of investigator and patient expectations